Do Explanations of Absenteeism Differ for Men and Women?
- 1 November 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Relations
- Vol. 48 (11) , 1309-1329
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679504801104
Abstract
Despite the consistent finding in the absence literature that women tend to be absent more often than men, little attention has been paid to whether the process of absence differs by sex. This issue is examined using data collected from 1401 Australian employees from 61 different workplaces. Hypotheses suggest that the predictive ability of job satisfaction, age, commuting time, family responsibilities, stressful life events and shift work on absence behavior differs for men and women. To test these hypotheses, a multivariate model is developed and estimated. The results indicate that there are structural differences in the absence behavior of men and women, requiring the estimation of models separately for each sex. Moreover, strong support for all but one of the hypotheses is found. These results show the critical importance of considering the sex of employees when developing explanatory models of absence.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Relative Influence of Life Events and Hassles on Work-Related Injuries: Some Australian EvidenceHuman Relations, 1994
- Prior absenteeism, supervisory style, job satisfaction, and personal characteristics: An investigation of some mediated and moderated linkages to work absenteeismOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991
- Smoking and absenteeismApplied Economics, 1991
- The relationship between absenteeism and stressWork & Stress, 1989
- Correlates of Absence from Work Due to IllnessHuman Relations, 1986
- Tobit models: A surveyJournal of Econometrics, 1984
- Sex Differences in AbsenteeismIndustrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 1983
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980
- Major influences on employee attendance: A process model.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978
- Employee reactions to job characteristics.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1971