‘An Ordinary Sexual Life?’:A Review of the Normalisation Principle as It Applies to the Sexual Options of People with Learning Disabilities
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Disability & Society
- Vol. 9 (2) , 123-144
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599466780181
Abstract
This paper explains why the normalisation principle has had so little effect on the sexual options open to people with learning disabilities. It analyses discourses about services and about sexuality and suggests that one implicit role of services is the regulation of sexuality and the creation of sexual boundaries. The paper questions whether there are homogenous sexual values, and challenges the assumption that sexuality is ‘natural’ arguing that this view is simplistic and hides the extent to which rules about sexual behaviour are applied on the basis of social inequalities. Thus, the paper explores assumptions and ideologies about sexuality, normality and integration and reinstates all three concepts to a problematical status. It questions the ways in which people with learning disabilities are really free to be ‘sexual’ and the penalties they face in breaking out of the roles which have been prescribed for them.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Defining Sexual Abuse as it Affects Adults with Learning DisabilitiesJournal of the British Institute of Mental Handicap (APEX), 2009
- THE SEXUAL ABUSE OF ADULTS WITH LEARNING DISABILITES: RESULTS OF A TWO YEAR INCIDENCE SURVEYMental Handicap Research, 1993
- NormalisationPublished by Taylor & Francis ,1992
- Gender and power in organizations: A longitudinal perspective.Psychological Bulletin, 1989
- Coping with the sexuality of the disabledInternational Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 1987
- Parental opposition to deinstitutionalization: A challenge in need of attention and resolution.Law and Human Behavior, 1980