Standardization by Bivariate Adjustment of Internal Assessments: Sex Bias and Other Statistical Matters
- 1 November 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Australian Journal of Education
- Vol. 29 (3) , 231-247
- https://doi.org/10.1177/000494418502900304
Abstract
The paper canvasses several matters related to the title. In particular, use of scores from the Australian Scholastic Aptitude Test (ASAT) to provide moderating parameters for raw scores derived from teacher assessments of Year 12 students’ achievements is shown to be inconsistent with respect to gender differences of overall achievements when the groups whose scores are moderated have different sex-ratios, as occurs with single-sex male or female or mixed-sex colleges. ASAT scores are examined statistically with respect to gender differences, a rationale for removing the gender bias from the aggregate achievement assessments is described, and the inadequacy of relying solely on aptitude tests to produce comparisons of achievements is noted.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Critique of Standardization by Bivariate Adjustment—A RejoinderAustralian Journal of Education, 1978
- A Critique of Standardization by Bivariate AdjustmentAustralian Journal of Education, 1978
- Standardization Procedures Involving Moderator Variables—Some Theoretical ConsiderationsAustralian Journal of Education, 1975
- THE CONVERSION OF SCORES TO A UNIFORM SCALEBritish Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1958
- THE RESCALING OF TEACHERS' ESTIMATESBritish Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1958