Lung Cancer: Computerized Quantification of Tumor Response—Initial Results
- 1 December 2006
- journal article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 241 (3) , 892-898
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2413051887
Abstract
To prospectively quantify tumor response or progression in patients with lung cancer by using thin-section computed tomography (CT) and a semiautomated algorithm to calculate tumor volume and other parameter values. This HIPAA-compliant study was institutional review board approved; informed patient consent was waived. CT scans of 15 measurable non-small cell lung cancers (in five men and 10 women; mean age, 64 years; range, 38-78 years) before and after gefitinib treatment were analyzed. A semiautomated three-dimensional lung cancer segmentation algorithm was developed and applied to each tumor at baseline and follow-up. The computer calculated the greatest diameter (unidimensional measurement), the product of the greatest diameter and the greatest perpendicular diameter (bidimensional measurement), and the volume of each tumor. Exact McNemar tests were used to analyze differences in the percentage change calculated with different measurement techniques. The computer accurately segmented 14 of the 15 tumors. One paramediastinal tumor required manual separation from the mediastinum. Eleven (73%) of the 15 patients had an absolute change in tumor volume of at least 20%, compared with one (7%) and four (27%) patients who had similar changes in unscaled unidimensional (P < .01) and bidimensional (P = .04) tumor measurements, respectively. Seven (47%) patients had an absolute change in tumor volume of at least 30%. In contrast, at unscaled analysis, no patients at unidimensional measurement (P = .02) and two (13%) patients at bidimensional measurement (P = .06) had a change of at least 30%. Compared with the unidimensional and bidimensional techniques, semiautomated tumor segmentation enabled the identification of a larger number of patients with absolute changes in tumor volume of at least 20% and 30%.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pulmonary Metastases: Effect of CT Section Thickness on Measurement—Initial ExperienceRadiology, 2005
- Evaluation of the response to treatment of solid tumours – a consensus statement of the International Cancer Imaging SocietyBritish Journal of Cancer, 2004
- A statistical simulation study finds discordance between WHO criteria and RECIST guidelineJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2004
- Tumour Size Measurement in an Oncology Clinical Trial: Comparison Between Off-site and On-site MeasurementsClinical Radiology, 2003
- Evaluation of Tumor Measurements in Oncology: Use of Film-Based and Electronic TechniquesJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid TumorsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Three-dimensional multicriterion automatic segmentation of pulmonary nodules of helical computed tomography imagesOptical Engineering, 1999
- Two‐dimensional multi‐criterion segmentation of pulmonary nodules on helical CT imagesMedical Physics, 1999
- Analysis of interobserver and intraobserver variability in CT tumor measurements.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1996
- Reporting results of cancer treatmentCancer, 1981