The Relationship Between Resistance and Adherence in Drug-Naive Individuals Initiating HAART Is Specific to Individual Drug Classes
- 1 November 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
- Vol. 49 (3) , 266-271
- https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0b013e318189a753
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the relationship between HIV-1 drug resistance and adherence and the accumulation rate of resistance mutations in 1191 HIV-infected, antiretroviral-naive adults initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy in British Columbia, Canada. Methods: Plasma samples with plasma viral load >1000 copies per milliliter collected within 30 months of follow-up were genotyped for drug resistance. Adherence was estimated using prescription refills and plasma drug levels. The primary outcome measure was time to detection of drug resistance. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) associated with baseline variables. Results: The accumulation rates of multiple primary and secondary mutations were similar in patients initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy with protease inhibitor versus nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). Rates decreased approximately 50% per additional mutation. At 80%-90% adherence based on refills, there was greater risk of detecting lamivudine (3TC) [HR 3.0, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.9 to 4.7; P < 0.0001] and NNRTI mutations (HR 6.0, 95% CI: 3.3 to 10.9; P < 0.0001) compared with the ≥95% refill reference group. In a multivariate model, individuals with P = 0.0001) and NNRTI resistance (HR 7.0, 95% CI: 3.4 to 14.5; P = 0.0001) compared with the reference group of ≥95% refills with consistently detectable drug levels. Adherence-resistance relationships were much weaker for protease inhibitors and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors as there was little variance in HRs among the different adherence strata compared with 3TC and NNRTIs. Conclusion: The relationships between resistance, adherence, and mutation accumulation differ between HIV drug classes.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Explaining variability in the relationship between antiretroviral adherence and HIV mutation accumulationJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2006
- Adherence–resistance relationships for protease and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors explained by virological fitnessAIDS, 2006
- Relationship between Adherence and the Development of Resistance in Antiretroviral‐Naive, HIV‐1–Infected Patients Receiving Lopinavir/Ritonavir or NelfinavirThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2005
- Modeling the HIV Protease Inhibitor Adherence–Resistance Curve by Use of Empirically Derived EstimatesThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Paradoxes of adherence and drug resistance to HIV antiretroviral therapyJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2004
- Are untimed antiretroviral drug levels useful predictors of adherence behavior?AIDS, 2004
- High levels of adherence do not prevent accumulation of HIV drug resistance mutationsAIDS, 2003
- Antiretroviral Concentrations in Untimed Plasma Samples Predict Therapy Outcome in a Population with Advanced DiseaseThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2003
- Determinants of Virological Response to Antiretroviral Therapy: Implications for Long-Term StrategiesClinical Infectious Diseases, 2000
- Absence of zidovudine resistance in antiretroviral-naive patients following zidovudine/lamivudine/protease inhibitor combination therapy: virological evaluation of the AVANTI 2 and AVANTI 3 studiesAIDS, 2000