Rhetoric, Ritualism, and Totemism in Human Resource Management
- 1 April 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Relations
- Vol. 48 (4) , 367-385
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679504800404
Abstract
This paper posits an interpretivist approach to the study of human resource management (HRM) by examining how organizational members construct meanings of HRM in everyday life through ritualistic behavior and the use of language. Concepts from language philosophy and socio-anthropology are brought together to develop an analytical premise upon which we can begin to appreciate the seemingly complex issues associated with expressive and ritualistic behavior in organizations. Propositions are posited and subsequently examined through an analysis of statements about teamwork in a Kenyan firm. A thematic analysis reveals that teamwork is a totemic device created by organizational members in everyday life. Through shifts in language games ranging from rhetoric to plain speaking, management uses the totem of teamwork to create and legitimize the desired pattern of power and social relations.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Human resource managementThe International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1992
- Organizational Environment in Africa: A Factor Analysis of Critical IncidentsHuman Relations, 1991
- Human Resource Management: A Multiparadigmatic AnalysisPersonnel Review, 1991
- Review Article Human resource management: rhetoric, reality and contradictionThe International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1990
- HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND THE AMERICAN DREAM*Journal of Management Studies, 1990
- The Role of Metaphors in Organization TransformationHuman Relations, 1989
- Accounting for ritualsAccounting, Organizations and Society, 1987
- Symbolic management of human resourcesHuman Resource Management, 1986
- Personnel and paradigms: four perspectives on the futureIndustrial Relations Journal, 1986
- Attributions in the Board Room: Causal Reasoning in Corporate Annual ReportsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1983