Mitomycin C Versus Estramustine in the Treatment of Hormone Resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Thefinal Analysis of the European Organization Forresearch and Treatment of Cancer, Genitourinarygroup Prospective Randomized Phase III Study (30865)
- 1 December 1993
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 150 (6) , 1840-1844
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35911-6
Abstract
A total of 171 patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer following hormonal therapy was randomized to receive either 560 to 700 mg. estramustine orally per day or 15 mg./m.2 mitomycin C by intravenous infusion every 6 weeks. The patients were recruited during a 2.5-year period, and 70% had undergone more than 1 previous therapy for prostate cancer, with some having received as many as 5 different previous treatments. The overall results were disappointing. The median time to progression was 5 months and 50% of the patients died within 10 months. There was no difference in efficacy between the 2 treatment arms. Toxicity was severe in both arms but appeared earlier in those patients receiving estramustine, leading to a tendency for earlier deterioration in performance status. In this group of heavily pretreated patients there appears to be no justification for the use of either of these agents at the present time.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mitomycin-C in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer: report on an EORTC phase II studyWorld Journal of Urology, 1986
- A Comparison of the Effect of Diethylstilbestrol with Low Dose Estramustine Phosphate in the Treatment of Advanced Prostatic Cancer: Final Analysis of a Phase III Trial of the European Organization for Research on Treatment of CancerJournal of Urology, 1986
- Growth and Cell Survival Following Treatment with Estramustine, Nor-Nitrogen Mustard, Estradiol and Testosterone of a Human Prostatic Cancer Cell Line (DU 145)Journal of Urology, 1982