Integrating Memory-Based and Constructionist Processes in Accounts of Reading Comprehension
- 1 May 2005
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Discourse Processes
- Vol. 39 (2) , 299-316
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3902&3_11
Abstract
Memory-based and constructionist processes have both been proposed as essential components of the activation of concepts (e.g., propositions) and the establishment of meaningful connections between concepts during reading. In this article, we argue that a comprehensive theory of reading comprehension should include both sets of processes. In support of this view, we summarize the results of several studies that support the contribution of both processes during reading. In addition, we describe the conceptual framework of the Landscape Model, in which memory-based and constructionist processes are explicitly interconnected and dynamically interact in an account of reading comprehension.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Accessing the discourse representation during readingDiscourse Processes, 1998
- What is readily available during reading? A memory‐based view of text processingDiscourse Processes, 1998
- The readiness is all: The functionality of memory‐based text processingDiscourse Processes, 1998
- Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherenceDiscourse Processes, 1996
- The availability of causal information during readingDiscourse Processes, 1996
- Activation and suppression of antecedents during reinstatement.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1995
- Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1994
- Investigations of inferential processes in reading: A theoretical and methodological integrationDiscourse Processes, 1993
- Overcoming misconceptions in science: An on‐line study of prior knowledge activationReading Research and Instruction, 1989
- A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review, 1975