Hemorrhagic Shock
- 1 February 1967
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Surgery
- Vol. 94 (2) , 190-194
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1967.01330080028010
Abstract
SINCE By waters1described the features of acute renal failure in 1940, this syndrome has come to be recognized as a major source of morbidity and mortality in the seriously injured patient. Analysis of the battle casualities in the Korean conflict indicated that 33% of the soldiers dying of wounds exhibited gross and microscopic changes of acute renal failure in specimens obtained at autopsy. In spite of numerous attempts, a single agent responsible for the development of acute renal failure has never been clearly identified. The close clinical association of a major hypotensive episode with the subsequent development of renal failure has directed attention to the role of the renal circulation in the pathogenesis of this lesion. It has prompted the impression that agents which increase or maintain renal blood flow in the face of systemic hypotension will offer significant prophylaxis against the development of renal failure. The renalThis publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hemorrhage Without HypotensionAnnals of Surgery, 1964
- COMPARISON OF DIRECT WITH INDIRECT RENAL BLOOD FLOW, EXTRACTION OF INULIN AND DIODRAST, BEFORE AND DURING ACUTE RENAL NERVE STIMULATIONAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1950
- THE RELATION OF RENAL BLOOD FLOW TO EFFECTIVE ARTERIAL PRESSURE IN THE INTACT KIDNEY OF THE DOGAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1946
- RENAL BLOOD FLOW AND RENAL CLEARANCE DURING HEMORRHAGIC SHOCKAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1946
- THE RENAL CIRCULATION IN SHOCK 1Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1944