Predator avoidance, microhabitat shift, and risk-sensitive foraging in larval dragonflies
- 1 October 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Oecologia
- Vol. 77 (1) , 81-90
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00380929
Abstract
Dragonfly larvae (Odonata: Anisoptera) are often abundant in shallow freshwater habitats and frequently co-occur with predatory fish, but there is evidence that they are underutilized as prey. This suggests that species which successfully coexist with fish may exhibit behaviors that minimize their risk of predation. I conducted field and laboratory experiments to determine whether: 1) dragonfly larvae actively avoid fish, 2) microhabitat use and foraging success of larvae are sensitive to predation risk, and 3) vulnerability of larvae is correlated with microhabitat use. I experimentally manipulated the presence of adult bluegills (Lepomis macrochirus) in defaunated patches of littoral substrate in a small pond to test whether colonizing dragonfly larvae would avoid patches containing fish. The two dominant anisopteran species, Tetragoneuria cynosura and Ladona deplanata (Odonata: Libellulidae), both strongly avoided colonizing patches where adult bluegills were present. Laboratory experiments examined the effects of diel period and bluegills on microhabitat use and foraging success, using Tetragoneuria, Ladona and confamilial Sympetrum semicictum, found in a nearby fishless pond. Tetragoneuria and Ladona generally occupied microhabitats offering cover, whereas Sympetrum usually occupied exposed locations. Bluegills induced increased use of cover in all three species, and use of cover also tended to be higher during the day than at night. Bluegills depressed foraging in Tetragoneuria and to a lesser extent in Ladona, but foraging in Sympetrum appeared unaffected. Other laboratory experiments indicated that Sympetrum were generally more vulnerable than Tetragoneuria or Ladona to bluegill predation, and that vulnerability was positively correlated with use of exposed microhabitats. Both fixed (generally low use of exposed microhabitats, diel microhabitat shifts) and reactive (predator avoidance, predator-sensitive microhabitat shifts) behavioral responses appear to reduce risk of predation in dragonfly larvae. Evidence indicates that vulnerability probably varies widely among species and even among instars within species, and suggests that spatial distributions of relatively vulnerable species may be limited by their inability to avoid predation.Keywords
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- Empirical Models for Zoobenthic Biomass in LakesCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1987
- The effects of fish and pH on the distribution and abundance of backswimmers (Hemiptera: Notonectidae)Canadian Journal of Zoology, 1986
- Estimating food availability for larval dragonflies: a cautionary noteCanadian Journal of Zoology, 1986
- Effects of Predatory Sculpin on the Chironomid Communities in an Arctic LakeEcology, 1985
- Rates of Food Exploitation by Littoral Fishes in a Mesotrophic North-Temperate LakeCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1985
- Discrimination and Avoidance Reactions towards Predatory and Nonpredatory Fish by Blacknose Dace, Rhinichthys atratulus (Pisces: Cyprinidae)Zeitschrift Fur Tierpsychologie, 1984
- An Index of Food Limitation in the Field for the Larval Dragonfly Anax junius (Odonata: Aeshnidae)Freshwater Invertebrate Biology, 1982
- Fish Predation, Interspecific Predation, and the Distribution of Two Chaoborus SpeciesEcology, 1979
- Differential Predation by Fish on Two Species of Chaoborus (Diptera, Chaoboridae)Oikos, 1978
- A Modified Flotation Technique for Sorting Bottom Fauna Samples1Limnology and Oceanography, 1959