Understanding the Coaching Process: A Framework for Social Analysis
- 1 February 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Quest
- Vol. 54 (1) , 34-48
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2002.10491765
Abstract
Despite the recent increase of research into coaching, the essential social and cultural nature of the process has received little attention. The purpose of this paper is to suggest a framework for undertaking a social analysis of coaching. Specifically, the case is made for analyzing coaching using three interrelated concepts-role, interaction, and power-in order to critically interrogate coaching practice. We argue that, while not exhaustive, such an analysis can reveal the importance of key, but often underplayed, components of the coaching process, including social and cultural contexts, personal experiences, personal philosophies, professional practice, and the ways in which they are interconnected. The paper is thus grounded in the belief that recognizing and understanding the social sphere of the coaching process is a necessary step toward understanding coaching practice and using that understanding to support coaches more effectively.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Toward an Holistic Understanding of the Coaching ProcessQuest, 2000
- POWERJournal of Sport and Social Issues, 1998
- Whose Expectations Matter? The Relative Power of First‐ and Second‐Order Expectations in Determining Social InfluenceAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1997
- From Role-Playing to Role-Using: Understanding Role as ResourceSocial Psychology Quarterly, 1994
- Becoming a High School Coach: From Playing Sports to CoachingResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1989
- Mead Among the Cognitivists: Roles as Performance ImageryJournal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 1987
- The effective use of powerBusiness Horizons, 1986
- MANAGERIAL POWER AND ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS: A CONTINGENCY ANALYSISJournal of Management Studies, 1978
- Social action as the control of affectBehavioral Science, 1977
- Decisions and Nondecisions: An Analytical FrameworkAmerican Political Science Review, 1963