A personal view of some controversies in allocating treatment to patients in clinical trials
- 30 December 1995
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 14 (24) , 2661-2674
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780142406
Abstract
A non‐exhaustive but nevertheless wide‐ranging if biased and personal view of various matters affecting the allocation of treatments to patients in controlled clinical trials will be undertaken from the standpoint of a statistician working in drug development. The following topics are considered: the use of ‘placebos’ in the run‐in phase; the use of crossover trials; selection of patients; various matters concerning centres; two extreme alternatives to randomization, and various matters linking blinding and allocation.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comprehensive algorithm for determining whether a run‐in strategy will be a cost‐effective design modification in a randomized clinical trialStatistics in Medicine, 1993
- Cutoff assignment strategies for enhancing randomized clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1992
- Repeated measures in clinical trials: Analysis using mean summary statistics and its implications for designStatistics in Medicine, 1992
- Is the ‘simple carry‐over’ model useful?Statistics in Medicine, 1992
- Falsificationism and clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1991
- A simulation study comparing designs for dose rangingStatistics in Medicine, 1991
- The performance of the two‐stage analysis of two‐treatment, two‐period crossover trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1989
- On the possibility of incorporating patients from non-randomising centres into a randomised clinical trialJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1979
- Assignment to Treatment Group on the Basis of a CovariateJournal of Educational Statistics, 1977
- THE PROBABLE ERROR OF A MEANBiometrika, 1908