Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease
- 8 July 2009
- reference entry
- Published by Wiley
- No. 3,p. CD003677
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd003677.pub4
Abstract
Background The three approaches to hysterectomy for benign disease are abdominal hysterectomy (AH), vaginal hysterectomy (VH), and laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). Laparoscopic hysterectomy has three further subdivisions depending on the part of the procedure performed laparoscopically. Objectives To assess the most beneficial and least harmful surgical approach to hysterectomy for women with benign gynaecological conditions. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register of controlled trials (15 August 2008), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1950 to August 2008), EMBASE (1980 to August 2008), Biological Abstracts (1969 to August 2008), the National Research Register, and relevant citation lists. Selection criteria Only randomised controlled trials comparing one surgical approach to hysterectomy with another were included. Data collection and analysis Independent selection of trials and data extraction were employed following Cochrane guidelines. Main results There were 34 included studies with 4495 women. The benefits of VH versus AH were speedier return to normal activities (mean difference (MD) 9.5 days), fewer febrile episodes or unspecified infections (odds ratio (OR) 0.42), and shorter duration of hospital stay (MD 1.1 days). The benefits of LH versus AH were speedier return to normal activities (MD 13.6 days), lower intraoperative blood loss (MD 45 cc), a smaller drop in haemoglobin (MD 0.55 g/dl), shorter hospital stay (MD 2.0 days), and fewer wound or abdominal wall infections (OR 0.31) at the cost of more urinary tract (bladder or ureter) injuries (OR 2.41) and longer operation time (MD 20.3 minutes). The benefits of LAVH versus TLH were fewer febrile episodes or unspecified infection (OR 3.77) and shorter operation time (MD 25.3 minutes). There was no evidence of benefits of LH versus VH and the operation time (MD 39.3 minutes) as well as substantial bleeding (OR 2.76) were increased in LH. For some important outcomes, the analyses were underpowered to detect important differences or they were simply not reported in trials. Data were absent for many important long‐term outcome measures. Authors' conclusions Because of equal or significantly better outcomes on all parameters, VH should be performed in preference to AH where possible. Where VH is not possible, LH may avoid the need for AH however the length of the surgery increases as the extent of the surgery performed laparoscopically increases. The surgical approach to hysterectomy should be decided by the woman in discussion with her surgeon in light of the relative benefits and hazards.Keywords
This publication has 70 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hysterectomy for Benign Uterine Pathology Among Women Without Previous Vaginal DeliveryObstetrics & Gynecology, 2008
- Systematic review on recovery specific quality-of-life instrumentsSurgery, 2008
- What is the value of preoperative bimanual pelvic examination in women undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy?Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2007
- Quality of life and surgical outcome after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: A randomized, controlled trialJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2007
- Value of laparoscopic assistance for vaginal hysterectomy with prophylactic bilateral oophorectomyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2006
- Tissue trauma after vaginal hysterectomy and colporrhaphy versus abdominal hysterectomy: A randomised controlled studyAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2004
- Randomized, prospective, double‐blind comparison of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy in women without uterovaginal prolapseActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2003
- Comparative study of vaginal, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and abdominal hysterectomies for uterine myoma larger than 6 cm in diameter or uterus weighing at least 450 g: a prospective randomized studyActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2002
- Prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) with abdominal hysterectomy (AH) for the treatment of the uterus weighing >200 gSurgical Endoscopy, 2001
- A Comparison of Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy and Abdominal HysterectomyJournal of Gynecologic Surgery, 1993