Randomized controlled trials do not reflect reality: Real-world analyses are critical for treatment guidelines!
- 31 July 2006
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vol. 132 (1) , 5-7
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.03.035
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Propensity scores and the surgeonBritish Journal of Surgery, 2006
- Long-Term Outcomes of Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting versus Stent ImplantationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Sample Size Matters: A Guide for SurgeonsWorld Journal of Surgery, 2005
- Surgery is the best intervention for severe coronary artery diseaseBMJ, 2005
- Propensity Analysis of Long-Term Survival After Surgical or Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease and High-Risk FeaturesCirculation, 2004
- A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: one- to eight-year outcomesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2003
- Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists CollaborationPublished by Elsevier ,1994
- Influence of the Internal-Mammary-Artery Graft on 10-Year Survival and Other Cardiac EventsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Eleven-Year Survival in the Veterans Administration Randomized Trial of Coronary Bypass Surgery for Stable AnginaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- The Importance of Beta, the Type II Error and Sample Size in the Design and Interpretation of the Randomized Control TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978