Clinical trials of multiple sclerosis monitored with enhanced MRI: new sample size calculations based on large data sets
Open Access
- 1 April 2001
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Vol. 70 (4) , 494-499
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.70.4.494
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A new parametric simulation procedure based on the negative binomial (NB) model was used to evaluate the sample sizes needed to achieve optimal statistical powers for parallel groups (with (PGB) and without (PG) a baseline correction scan). It was also used for baseline versus treatment (BVT) design clinical trials in relapsing-remitting (RR) and secondary progressive (SP) multiple sclerosis (MS), when using the number of new enhancing lesions seen on monthly MRI of the brain as the measure of outcome. METHODS MRI data obtained from 120 untreated patients with RRMS selected for the presence of MRI activity at baseline, 66 untreated and unselected patients with RRMS, and 81 untreated and unselected patients with SPMS were fitted using an NB distribution. All these patients were scanned monthly for at least 6 months and were all from the placebo arms of three large scale clinical trials and one natural history study. The statistical powers were calculated for durations of follow up of 3 and 6 months. RESULTS The frequency of new enhancing lesions in patients with SPMS was lower, but not significantly different, from that seen in unselected patients with RRMS. As expected, enhancement was more frequent in patients with RRMS selected for MRI activity at baseline than in the other two patient groups. As a consequence, the estimated sample sizes needed to detect treatment efficacy in selected patients with RRMS were smaller than those of unselected patients with RRMS and those with SPMS. Baseline correction was also seen to reduce the sample sizes of PG design trials. An increased number of scans reduced the sample sizes needed to perform BVT trials, whereas the gain in power was less evident in PG and PGB trials. CONCLUSION This study provides reliable estimates of the sample sizes needed to perform MRI monitored clinical trials in the major MS clinical phenotypes, which should be useful for planning future studies.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantitative MRI in patients with secondary progressive MS treated with monoclonal antibody Campath 1HNeurology, 1999
- Statistical power of MRI monitored trials in multiple sclerosis: new data and comparison with previous resultsJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1999
- Correlations between monthly enhanced MRI Lesion rate and changes in T2 Lesion volume in multiple sclerosisAnnals of Neurology, 1998
- Exploratory treatment trials in multiple sclerosis using MRI: sample size calculations for relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive subgroups using placebo controlled parallel groupsJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1998
- Magnetic resonance studies of intramuscular interferon β–1a for relapsing multiple sclerosisAnnals of Neurology, 1998
- Guidelines for the use of magnetic resonance techniques in monitoring the treatment of multiple sclerosisAnnals of Neurology, 1996
- Magnetic resonance imaging in monitoring the treatment of multiple sclerosis patients: Statistical power of parallel-groups and crossover designsJournal of the Neurological Sciences, 1994
- Gadolinium enhancement increases the sensitivity of MRI in detecting disease activity in multiple sclerosisBrain, 1993
- Using gadolinium‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging lesions to monitor disease activity in multiple sclerosisAnnals of Neurology, 1992
- Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosisNeurology, 1983