The missed lessons of Sir Austin Bradford Hill
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 4 October 2004
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations
- Vol. 1 (1) , 3
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5573-1-3
Abstract
Austin Bradford Hill's landmark 1965 paper contains several important lessons for the current conduct of epidemiology. Unfortunately, it is almost exclusively cited as the source of the "Bradford-Hill criteria" for inferring causation when association is observed, despite Hill's explicit statement that cause-effect decisions cannot be based on a set of rules. Overlooked are Hill's important lessons about how to make decisions based on epidemiologic evidence. He advised epidemiologists to avoid over-emphasizing statistical significance testing, given the observation that systematic error is often greater than random error. His compelling and intuitive examples point out the need to consider costs and benefits when making decisions about health-promoting interventions. These lessons, which offer ways to dramatically increase the contribution of health science to decision making, are as needed today as they were when Hill presented them.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hill's Criteria of CausationPublished by Wiley ,2005
- Semi-Automated Sensitivity Analysis to Assess Systematic Errors in Observational DataEpidemiology, 2003
- Quantifying and Reporting Uncertainty from Systematic ErrorsEpidemiology, 2003
- The Impact of Prior Distributions for Uncontrolled Confounding and Response BiasJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2003
- Estimating causal effectsInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2002
- The economics of ‘more research is needed’International Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- Our Policy on PolicyEpidemiology, 2001
- Policy Recommendations in Epidemiology Research PapersEpidemiology, 1993
- A Show of ConfidenceNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- The Problem of Social CostThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1960