Provider roles in the recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials
- 2 January 2007
- Vol. 109 (3) , 465-476
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22436
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Providers play a vital role in the successful recruitment of underrepresented patients to cancer clinical trials because they often introduce the opportunity of clinical trials. The purpose of the current systematic review was to describe provider‐related factors influencing recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials. METHODS. To find original studies on the recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials, electronic databases from January 1966 to December 2005 were searched; hand‐searched titles in 34 journals from January 2003 to January 2006; and reference lists were examined of eligible articles. Title and abstract reviews were conducted to identify relevant studies. Potential articles were then abstracted using a structured instrument and a serial review process by 2 investigators. RESULTS. Eighteen studies were eligible for review: 13 targeted healthcare providers, 3 targeted patients/participants, and 2 targeted both providers and patients. The study designs included randomized controlled trial, concurrent controlled trial, case‐control, descriptive, and qualitative. A lack of available protocols and/or a lack of provider awareness about clinical trials prevented providers from discussing the opportunity of clinical trials in 2 studies. In 14 studies, patient accrual was affected by provider attitudinal barriers relating to patient adherence to the study protocol, patient mistrust of research, patient costs, data collection costs, and/or patient eligibility. Providers' communication methods were barriers in 5 studies and promoters in 1 study. CONCLUSIONS. A heterogeneous body of evidence suggests that several provider‐related factors influence recruitment of underrepresented groups to clinical trials. Future recruitment efforts should address these factors. Cancer 2007;109:465–476. © 2007 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Should Elderly Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Be Offered Elderly-Specific Trials? Results of a Pooled Analysis From the North Central Cancer Treatment GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Are Racial and Ethnic Minorities Less Willing to Participate in Health Research?PLoS Medicine, 2005
- Participation of Asian-American women in cancer chemoprevention researchCancer, 2005
- Factors that influence Spanish‐ and English‐speaking participants' decision to enroll in cancer randomized clinical trialsPsycho‐Oncology, 2005
- Improving Accrual of Older Persons to Cancer Treatment Trials: A Randomized Trial Comparing an Educational Intervention With Standard Information: CALGB 360001Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- An Evaluation of Barriers to Accrual in the Era of Legislation Requiring Insurance Coverage of Cancer Clinical Trial Costs in CaliforniaThe Cancer Journal, 2004
- Factors Associated With Breast Cancer Clinical Trials Participation and Enrollment at a Large Academic Medical CenterJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- To Refer or Not to Refer: Factors that Affect Primary Care Provider Referral of Patients with Cancer to Clinical Treatment TrialsJournal of Cancer Education, 2004
- Physician Perspectives on Increasing Minorities in Cancer Clinical TrialsAnnals of Epidemiology, 2000
- Entry into clinical trials in breast cancer: the importance of specialist teamsEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1998