Comparison of two induction regimens using or not using muscle relaxant: impact on postoperative upper airway discomfort †
Open Access
- 15 June 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in British Journal of Anaesthesia
- Vol. 99 (2) , 276-281
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aem147
Abstract
Muscle relaxants facilitate tracheal intubation, but they are often not used for short peripheral surgical procedures. The consequences of this practice on the upper airway are still a matter of controversy. We therefore compared the incidence of post-intubation symptoms in a randomized study comparing patients intubated with or without the use of a muscle relaxant. A total of 300 adult patients requiring tracheal intubation for scheduled peripheral surgery were randomly assigned in a double-blind study to an anaesthetic protocol that either included or did not include a muscle relaxant (rocuronium). The primary end-point was the rate of post-intubation symptoms 2 and 24 h after extubation. The secondary end-points were the intubation conditions score (Copenhagen Consensus Conference), the rate of difficult intubations (Intubation Difficulty Scale), and the incidence of adverse haemodynamic events. Post-intubation symptoms were more frequent in patients intubated without the use of a muscle relaxant, whether 2 h (57% vs 43% of patients; P < 0.05) or 24 h (38% vs 26% of patients; P < 0.05) after extubation. Intubation conditions were better when the muscle relaxant was used. In patients intubated without a muscle relaxant, difficult intubation was more common (12% vs 1%; P < 0.05), as were arterial hypotension or bradycardia requiring treatment (12% vs 3% of patients; P < 0.05). The use of a muscle relaxant for tracheal intubation diminishes the incidence of adverse postoperative upper airway symptoms, results in better tracheal intubation conditions, and reduces the rate of adverse haemodynamic events.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tracheal intubation in routine practice with and without muscular relaxationPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2005
- Laryngeal Morbidity and Quality of Tracheal IntubationAnesthesiology, 2003
- Propofol — not thiopental or etomidate — with remifentanil provides adequate intubating conditions in the absence of neuromuscular blockadeCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2003
- Comparison of intubating conditions following propofol and succinylcholine with propofol and remifentanil 2 μg kg −1 or 4 μg kg −1British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2000
- French Survey of Anesthesia in 1996Anesthesiology, 1999
- Dosing study of remifentanil and propofol for tracheal intubation without the use of muscle relaxantsAnaesthesia, 1999
- Assessment of intubating conditions in adults after induction with propofol and varying doses of remifentanilBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1998
- Intubating conditions using cisatracurium after induction of anaesthesia with thiopentoneAnaesthesia, 1997
- Tracheal Intubation Using Alfentanil and No Muscle RelaxantAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1997
- Good Clinical Research Practice (GCRP) in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agentsActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1996