The impact of the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Trial 2002 on perceived risk communication and use of postmenopausal hormone therapy in Germany

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The purpose of this representative, nationwide telephone survey was to collect information about postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) use in relation to women's knowledge about the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Trial 2002 (WHI-RCT) in Germany. During July 2003, telephone interviews were conducted with randomly selected women aged 45 to 60 years (N = 10,030; response 59.9%; completed interviews n = 6,007). They were asked about information sources regarding the WHI-RCT, and use of HT in conjunction with it. Most women stated that they knew about the WHI-RCT (88.6%), and those with high educational status appeared to have more information than those with middle or low educational status. Among informed women (uninformed excluded), 46.6% continued, 25.7% stopped, and 14.2% ceased use of HT before the WHI-RCT. The prevalence of lifetime use of HT was higher in West Germany (37.4%) than in East Germany (29.2%), the highest prevalence of use was in the group aged 55 to 59 years. The most common reason to continue HT was the benefit risk assessment by physicians (58%); the most common reason to stop HT were women's perceptions that the risks of HT exceeded the benefits (56%). If information was solely given by physicians, women were more likely to continue HT (60.4%), compared with mass media (46.1%), as a source of information. The survey demonstrates the impact of the WHI-RCT in Germany, and shows that both the media and advice given by physicians were important. Women who continued to use HT did so largely because of their physician's advice. Women who discontinued were mainly those who had a negative subjective perception about risk of HT.