Quality assurance in palliative care: some of the problems
- 1 March 1995
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Hindawi Limited in European Journal of Cancer Care
- Vol. 4 (1) , 38-44
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2354.1995.tb00051.x
Abstract
This review considers some of the difficulties associated with quality assurance in the context of palliative care. In particular, it will focus on the key question of who should be responsible for assessing quality and the problems of over-reliance on one particular perspective. Problems encountered in formulating criteria, setting standards and developing outcome measures, many of which are exacerbated in the palliative care setting, are discussed. A review of some of the methods currently available for assessing quality and their limitations are delineated. Finally, attention is drawn to some of the practical and methodological difficulties currently confronting palliative care with regard to quality assurance.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Symptom evaluation in cancer careProgress in Palliative Care, 1993
- Exploring consumer views of care provided by the Macmillan nurse using the critical incident techniqueJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1993
- Audit of deaths in general practice: pilot study of the critical incident technique.Quality and Safety in Health Care, 1992
- Development of patient satisfaction questionnaires: I. Methodological issues.Quality and Safety in Health Care, 1992
- Measuring patient satisfaction: a test of construct validity.Quality and Safety in Health Care, 1992
- The patient’s experienceNursing Standard, 1990
- Using Proxies to Evaluate Quality of LifeMedical Care, 1989
- Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient?British Journal of Cancer, 1988
- The effect of treatment setting and patient characteristics on pain in terminal cancer patients: A report from the national hospice studyJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986
- DYING NOWThe Lancet, 1984