Some Theoretical and Pedagogical Implications of the Markedness Differential Hypothesis
- 1 October 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Studies in Second Language Acquisition
- Vol. 7 (3) , 289-307
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100005544
Abstract
This paper is intended as a programmatic contribution to the work of a number of scholars in second language acquisition (SLA) who are attempting to explain various facts about SLA in terms of an interaction between native-language transfer and language universals (Gass & Selinker, 1983). In the present paper, some of the theoretical assumptions and consequences of the Markedness Differential Hypothesis (MDH) (Eckman, 1977) are discussed in comparison with the Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis. Crucial differences between the two hypotheses are presented, and empirical evidence in favor of the MDH is reviewed. Pedagogical implications of the MDH are then taken up, and a strategy for interlanguage-intervention is discussed in light of an empirical study. Finally, several problems for the MDH which have been proposed in the literature are considered.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- MARKEDNESS IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION1Language Learning, 1982
- Some substantive universals in atomic phonologyLingua, 1978
- MARKEDNESS AND THE CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS HYPOTHESISLanguage Learning, 1977
- THE ACQUISITION OF COMPLEX ENGLISH STRUCTURES BY ADULT LEARNERS1Language Learning, 1975
- AN ERROR IN ERROR ANALYSIS1Language Learning, 1974
- NATURAL SEQUENCES IN CHILD SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION1Language Learning, 1974
- SHOULD WE TEACH CHILDREN SYNTAX?Language Learning, 1973
- A Non-Contrastive Approach to Error Analysis1ELT Journal, 1971
- The Contrastive Analysis HypothesisTESOL Quarterly, 1970
- An Investigation of Phonological InterferenceLanguage, 1966