RECIST vs. WHO: Prospective comparison of response criteria in an EORTC phase II clinical trial investigating ET-743 in advanced soft tissue sarcoma
- 31 July 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal Of Cancer
- Vol. 41 (10) , 1426-1430
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2005.04.005
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phase II Study of ET-743 in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability in Measurement of Non–Small-Cell Carcinoma Lung Lesions: Implications for Assessment of Tumor ResponseJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Radiological Measurement of Breast Cancer Metastases to Lung and Liver: Comparison Between WHO (Bidimensional) and RECIST (Unidimensional) GuidelinesJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 2003
- Assessment of tumour response to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: accuracy of the RECIST criteriaThe British Journal of Radiology, 2002
- Assessment of lung cancer response after nonoperative therapy: tumor diameter, bidimensional product, and volume. A serial ct scan-based studyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2001
- New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid TumorsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Prognostic Factors for the Outcome of Chemotherapy in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma: An Analysis of 2,185 Patients Treated With Anthracycline-Containing First-Line Regimens—A European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 1999
- Selection of large and objectively measurable target lesions in EORTC phase II trials: Impact on recruitment and response rateEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1993
- Southwest Oncology Group standard response criteria, endpoint definitions and toxicity criteriaInvestigational New Drugs, 1992
- Reporting results of cancer treatmentCancer, 1981