Value of Follow-Up in Patients Treated for Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx
- 1 January 1994
- book chapter
- Published by Springer Nature
- Vol. 134, 205-214
- https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84971-8_23
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The value of follow-up in patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neckEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1992
- Second malignancies in patients who have head and neck cancer: Incidence, effect on survival and implications based on the RTOG experienceInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1989
- Metastatic Neck Disease: Palpation vs Ultrasound ExaminationJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1989
- Is routine triple endoscopy cost-effective in head and neck cancer?The American Journal of Surgery, 1988
- An assessment of the value of triple endoscopy in the evaluation of head and neck cancer patientsJournal of Surgical Oncology, 1986
- Value of routine follow up of women treated for early carcinoma of the breast.BMJ, 1985
- The Role of Endoscopy in Evaluating Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Prospective StudyJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1985
- Routine Panendoscopy--Is It Necessary Every Time?JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1984
- Panendoscopy as a screening examination for simultaneous primary tumors in head and neck cancer: A prospective sequential study and review of the literatureThe Laryngoscope, 1982
- Value of outpatient follow-up after curative surgery for carcinoma of the large bowel.BMJ, 1980