Antigen‐specific suppression of anti‐influenza antibody production in man. Possible role of a membrane‐antigen complex

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
E rosette‐forming (E′) cells from human secondary lymphoid tissue were incubated with high dose influenza A virus (Mem‐Bel) in an attempt to generate antigen‐specific suppressor T cells. Suppression was assayed by transferring the antigen‐pulsed E+ cells into effector cultures consisting of E+ and E− cells stimulated with immunogenic amounts of either the inducing virus (Mem‐Bel) or the non‐cross‐reacting influenza B virus (B/HK). The transfer resulted in marked inhibition of IgG, IgA and IgM antibody production to Mem‐Be1 but not to the control antigen, B/HK virus. The suppres‐ sive effect was specific at the level of induction as well as expression since E+ cells exposed to high dose Mem‐Be1 could provide help to an effector culture containing E− cells and optimal dose of B/HK virus. However, metabolically active cells did not appear to be required for suppression. Thus, it could be elicited (a) after only 15 min incubation of E+ cells with high‐dose virus and (b) by E+ cells exposed to irradiation, incubated in the presence of metabolic inhibitors, or disrupted by repeated freeze thawing. In contrast, treatment of E+ cells with pronase reversed the suppressive effect. Interestingly, virus heated to 70 oC failed to induce suppression, while retailing the ability to elicit a normal helper response. Suppression induced by exposure to standard amounts of high‐dose antigen was medi‐ ated by T cells of both helperiinducer (Leu‐3a+) and suppressoricytotoxic subsets (Leu‐2a+), but not by B cells. Two groups of observations pointed to the B cell as the target of suppression. First, suppression could still be transferred to effector cultures in which helper T cells had been replaced by T cell‐replacing factor or suppressor T cells removed by irradiation. Second, significant inhibition of antibody production was obtained when the transfer of antigen‐pulsed E+ cells was delayed for up to 120 h after initiation of the effector culture. Taken together the results suggest that suppression in this system is due to the formation of an antigen bridge between specific receptor sites on the T cell membrane and the target. Although not dependent on triggering of metabolically active suppressor T cells the phenomenon highlights the need for care in interpreting the mechanism of suppression by high‐dose antigen and could, in addition, represent a biologically important control mechanism capable of rapid inhibition of effector T cells and B cells in sites of high antigen concentration.