RELATIVE MERITS OF PARTIAL SPLENECTOMY, SPLENIC REIMPLANTATION, AND IMMUNIZATION IN PREVENTING POSTSPLENECTOMY INFECTION

Google Scholar
  • 1 January 1979
    • journal article
    • research article
    • Vol. 86  (4) , 561-569
Abstract
Partial splenectomy, splenic autotransplantation and immunization with pneumococcal vaccine were reported to protect patients against overwhelming postsplenectomy infection, and this study was undertaken to evaluate these therapeutic alternatives. Rats were divided into experimental groups: 34 controls, 34 splenectomy, 34 partial splenectomy and 34 splenic autotransplantation animals. At 5 wk after operation, 2/3 of the animals were immunized with killed pneumococci. The effects of operation and immunization were studied by challenging the animals i.v. with pneumococci. Pneumococcal antibody titers were determined, and phagocytic uptake of pneumococci by the spleen and liver was measured. Immunization impressively increased the survival rate in all groups. At low-challenge doses autotransplantation prolonged survival. At higher challenge doses only partial splenectomy increased survival. Partial splenectomy and control animals had higher antibody titers than did splenectomy and autotransplantation rats. Animals with the highest antibody titers had the greatest splenic and hepatic phagocytic uptake of pneumococci. Partial splenectomy was more efficient in removing pneumococci than was autotransplantation. Thus immunization is 1 of the most important factors contributing to survival after splenectomy. Partial splenectomy is preferable to splenic autotransplantation because it is associated with higher antibody titers after immunization, better pneumococcal splenic uptake and improved survival rates.