Colonic Masses: Detection with MR Colonography
- 1 August 2000
- journal article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 216 (2) , 383-388
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.216.2.r00au11383
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess magnetic resonance (MR) colonography as a method for detection of colorectal masses, with conventional colonoscopy as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR colonography was performed in 132 patients referred for colonoscopy because of the possible presence of a mass. After rectal filling with a gadopentetate dimeglumine and water enema, T1-weighted three-dimensional gradient-echo MR studies were acquired with the patient in the prone and supine positions. Water-sensitive single-shot fast spin-echo MR images were also obtained. Surface-rendered virtual endoscopic endoluminal views, orthogonal sections in three planes, and water-sensitive MR images were interactively assessed for presence of colorectal masses by two radiologists. RESULTS: MR colonography was well tolerated without sedation or analgesia. MR image quality was sufficient for diagnosis in 127 (96%) patients. Most small (≤5-mm-diameter) masses were overlooked at MR colonography, but 19 of 31 6–10-mm lesions and 26 of 27 large (>10-mm) lesions were correctly identified. For these large masses, MR colonography had a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 99%, positive predictive value of 92%, and negative predictive value of 98% for detection of masses. CONCLUSION: MR colonography is a promising modality for help in detecting colorectal mass lesions larger than 10 mm in diameter.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer statistics, 1998CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1998
- Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practiceGastroenterology, 1997
- A Comparison of Fecal Occult-Blood Tests for Colorectal-Cancer ScreeningNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Hydrocolonic Ultrasonography in the Detection of Colonic Polyps and TumorsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Which hurts the most? A comparison of pain rating during double-contrast barium enema examination and colonoscopy.Radiology, 1994
- Colon cancer screening: Beyond efficacyGastroenterology, 1994
- Prevention of Colorectal Cancer by Colonoscopic PolypectomyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Flexible sigmoidoscopy may be ineffective for secondary prevention of colorectal cancer in asymptomatic, average-risk menDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1991
- Comparison of Serum CA 19–9 and CEA Levels in a Population at High Risk for Colorectal CancerHybridoma, 1989
- Genetic Alterations during Colorectal-Tumor DevelopmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988