Annotation: Deconstructing the attention deficit in fragile X syndrome: a developmental neuropsychological approach
- 19 July 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
- Vol. 45 (6) , 1042-1053
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.t01-1-00297.x
Abstract
Background: Fragile X syndrome is one of the world's leading hereditary causes of developmental delay in males. The past decade has witnessed an explosion of research that has begun to unravel the condition at its various levels: from the genetic and brain levels to the cognitive level, and then to the environmental and behavioural levels. Our aim in this review is to attempt to integrate some of the extensive body of knowledge to move the research a step closer to understanding how the dynamics of atypical development can influence the specific cognitive and behavioural end‐states frequently observed in children and adolescents with fragile X syndrome.Methods: We conducted a review of the current neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric approaches that have attempted to delineate the pattern of ‘spared’ and ‘impaired’ functions associated with the phenotype.Results: The profile of findings suggests that fragile X syndrome should not be viewed merely as a catalogue of spared and impaired cognitive functions or modules. Instead, there appears to be a process of almost gradual modularisation whereby cognitive mechanisms become domain specific as a function of development itself (Karmiloff‐Smith, 1992). The results of a decade of intense research point towards an early weakness in one or more components of executive control rather than single, static higher‐level deficits (e.g., spatial cognition, speech processing). This weakness affects both the development of more complex functions and current performance.Conclusions: The prevailing tendency to interpret developmental disorders in terms of fixed damage to distinct modular functions needs to be reconsidered. We offer this review as an example of an alternative approach, attempting to identify an initial deficit and its consequences for the course of development. Through better definition of the cognitive and behavioural phenotype, in combination with current progress in brain imaging techniques and molecular studies, the next decade should continue to hold exciting promise for fragile X syndrome and other neurodevelopmental disorders.Keywords
This publication has 90 references indexed in Scilit:
- Abilities and attainment in Smith‐Magenis syndromeDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 2001
- Microarray Identification of FMRP-Associated Brain mRNAs and Altered mRNA Translational Profiles in Fragile X SyndromeCell, 2001
- Advances in research on the fragile X syndromeMental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 2000
- Neuroanatomy of the fragile X knockout mouse brain studied using in vivo high resolution magnetic resonance imagingEuropean Journal of Human Genetics, 1999
- FMRP expression as a potential prognostic indicator in fragile X syndromeAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1999
- Comorbidity of autistic spectrum disorders in children with Down syndromeDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1999
- Prevalence and Phenotype Consequence of FRAXA and FRAXE Alleles in a Large, Ethnically Diverse, Special Education–Needs PopulationAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 1999
- Tissue specific expression of FMR–1 provides evidence for a functional role in fragile X syndromeNature Genetics, 1993
- Identification of a gene (FMR-1) containing a CGG repeat coincident with a breakpoint cluster region exhibiting length variation in fragile X syndromePublished by Elsevier ,1991
- A controlled trial of stimulant medication in children with the fragile X syndromeAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1988