Collective Climates: A Test of Their Sociopsychological Significance
- 1 December 1996
- journal article
- Published by Academy of Management in The Academy of Management Journal
- Vol. 39 (6) , 1675-1691
- https://doi.org/10.5465/257074
Abstract
This article contributes to debate on the measurement of organizational climate. Use of means cloaks wide variations in individual perceptions. Use of clustering techniques to identify groups of people who see climate in a similar way has been questioned because such “collectives” may not represent meaningful sociopsychological groups. The present work is based on the view that meaningful collectives are most likely to emerge when people work together on common tasks in relatively isolated and defined physical locations. In an organization in which such conditions exist, a clustering technique largely failed to identify meaningful social collectives.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rejoinder to Payne's comment on ‘A longitudinal study of climates’Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1990
- A longitudinal study of climatesJournal of Organizational Behavior, 1988
- Response: Organizations Are Not Central Tendencies: Shadowboxing in the Dark, Round 2Academy of Management Review, 1988
- Climate Formation: Issues and ExtensionsAcademy of Management Review, 1985
- Conceptualizing and Measuring Organizational and Psychological Climate: Pitfalls in Multilevel ResearchAcademy of Management Review, 1985
- Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982
- PERCEIVED JOB CHARACTERISTICS AND JOB SATISFACTION: AN EXAMINATION OF RECIPROCAL CAUSATIONPersonnel Psychology, 1980
- An investigation of the influence of job level and functional specialty on job attitudes and perceptions.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977
- Organizational climate: Its homogeneity within organizations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977
- A note on organizational climateOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1973