The Opportunity for Conspiracy in Asset Markets Organized with Dealer Intermediaries
- 1 April 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 13 (2) , 385-416
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/13.2.385
Abstract
This article reports an asset market experiment in which asymmetrically informed traders transact through competing dealers. Dealers face a classic adverse selection problem, because some traders have private information regarding the asset value while other traders are uninformed. When dealers cannot communicate outside the market, they price the asset competitively and the market is generally informationally efficient. When dealers communicate privately between periods, they collude successfully to widen spreads and increase profit. Another treatment permits traders to post limit orders, while still allowing dealers to communicate. Limit orders restore informational efficiency and narrow spreads but cause dealers to earn negative trading profits.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- On The Anatomy of the “Nonfacilitating” Features of the Double Auction Institution in Conspiratorial MarketsPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2018
- Market Transparency: Who Wins and Who Loses?The Review of Financial Studies, 1999
- Does order preferencing matter?Journal of Financial Economics, 1998
- Quotes, Prices, and Estimates in a Laboratory MarketThe Journal of Finance, 1996
- Why did NASDAQ Market Makers Stop Avoiding Odd-Eighth Quotes?The Journal of Finance, 1994
- Why do NASDAQ Market Makers Avoid Odd-Eighth Quotes?The Journal of Finance, 1994
- Rational Frenzies and CrashesJournal of Political Economy, 1994
- Efficiency and Renegotiation in Repeated GamesJournal of Economic Theory, 1993
- Off-Floor Trading, Disintegration, and the Bid-Ask Spread in Experimental MarketsThe Journal of Business, 1991
- Coalition-Proof Nash Equilibria I. ConceptsJournal of Economic Theory, 1987