Effects of Rating Procedure and Temporal Delay on the Magnitude of Contrast Effects in Performance Ratings
- 1 March 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 129 (2) , 157-166
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1995.9914955
Abstract
This study examined the effects of performance appraisal rating procedure and temporal delay between the viewing and rating of performance on contrast effects in performance ratings. College students (N = 183) viewed two videotapes depicting poor (anchor stimulus) and average (target stimulus) performance. There was no support for the hypothesized interaction between delay and procedure. However, lower contrast effects characterized the ratings of participants who rated both videotaped performances simultaneously relative to the ratings of those who rated the performances sequentially. In addition, contrast effects were smaller when a delay occurred between the observation and rating of performances. These findings suggest that the most common rating procedures used in laboratory investigations of contrast effects are likely to overstate the impact of this rating error in actual appraisal situations, in which delayed and simultaneous rating procedures are more widely used.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Context effects in performance appraisal: A methodological critique and empirical study.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1992
- Contrast Effects in Performance Ratings: Another Look Across TimeApplied Psychology, 1989
- Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989
- On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effectsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1983
- Untangling the performance appraisal dilemma: The influence of perceived organizational context on evaluative processes.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976
- Analysis of Data from Pre- and Posttest Designs: A CommentPsychological Reports, 1976
- Using a repeated measures ANOVA to analyze the data from a pretest-posttest design: A potentially confusing task.Psychological Bulletin, 1975
- Another look at contrast effects in the employment interview.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973
- Interviewer evaluations of job applicants' resumes as a function of the qualifications of the immediately preceding applicants: An examination of contrast effects.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1970
- Selection interview decisions: The relative influence of appearance and factual written information on an interviewer's final rating.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1967