Abstract
Consequences on mutation induction of a defective excision repair (exr- ) system have been studied in Drosophila for a series of 30 carcinogens, representing 17 mono-, six bi- or trifunctional agents, five cyclic alkylating agents and two polycyclic aromatic compounds. Repair-inactive spermatozoa or (late) spermatids were mutagenized and then transferred to excision-defective (mei-9L1) or appropriate excision proficient (exr+) oocytes. Hypermutability responses in exr in relation to the (exr+) genotype were determined by calculating frep−/frep+ (ratio = y) indices at x = 1% X-linked recessive lethal mutations (SLRL); frep− denotes induced SLRL frequency in mei-9L1, frep+ that induced in repairprofiient condition, and x = 1 means 1% SLRL in exr+. A linear positive relationship between frep−/frep+ estimates and nucleophilic selectivity (Swain and Scott's constants s) was established for 18 carcinogens, representing either monoand cyclic alkylating agents: frep−/frep+ = 12.4s − 1.9; r = r2 = 0.62, P < 0.01 Noticeable exceptions to this Unear correlation indicated that, although nucleophilicity is a principle detenninator for hypermutability response in exr mutants, other cellular factors play a significant role as well. These are (i) the faster rate of removal of methyl adduds compared to ethyl derivatives, (ii) the complex metabolism of some of the carcinogens (PC, DTIC, DMPT, Cl3DMPT) and (iii) the length of the time period Meen DNA modification and onset of replication after fertilization. By contrast, CEO and polyfunctional agents (FA, HMPA, MC, MCT, Thio-TEPA and BCNU) did not follow the linear relationship. They provided lower frep−/frep= indices than would be anticipated on the basis of their nucleophilic selectivity (MC, BCNU, Thio-TEPA) or were even inactive (FA, MCT, HMPA) in the Drosophila repair assay. Both in terms of consistency (monoand cyclic alkylating agents) and exceptional behavior (CEO, the six crosslinking agents), there is an intriguing positive Correlation between relative efficiency ranking of carcinogens and with respect to their position on the potency scale for hypermutability. Thus, in genetic terms, as most potent carcinogens in rodents appear to be thaw agents giving no effect or a low activity in the exr genotype in Drosophila: carcinogens with high potential for direct miscoding ′ENU, ENNG, DEN, iPMS, CEO and presumably DMBA (?)], and those capable of forming crosslinks (MC, MCT, HMPA, Thio-TEPA and BCNU).

This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit: