Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor

This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:

• Induction of labor with intravaginal administration of misoprostol
  International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1998
• Labor induction with prostaglandin E1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: A randomized trial
  Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1998
• A double-blind comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 to induce labor
  American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997
• Induction of labor in the nineties: Conquering the unfavorable cervix
  Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
• A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices
  Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
• A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction
  American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
• Misoprostol: An effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction
  American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
• Low‐dose vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor with a live fetus
  International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1995
• Induction of labour at term in primigravidae with low Bishop's score: a comparison of three methods
  European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1995
• Misoprostol to induce labour
  The Lancet, 1992