Comparison of Bioactive Glass Synthetic Bone Graft Particles and Open Debridement in the Treatment of Human Periodontal Defects. A Clinical Study
- 1 June 1998
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Periodontology
- Vol. 69 (6) , 698-709
- https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.6.698
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the repair response of bioactive glass synthetic bone graft particles and open debridement in the treatment of human periodontal osseous defects. Fifty‐nine defects in 16 healthy adults were selected. Each patient had at least 2 sites with attachment loss of at least 6 mm with clinical and radiographie evidence of intrabony or furcation defects. One to 3 months after causerelated therapy (oral hygiene instructions, scaling and root planing), the following measurements were recorded prior to surgery: probing depths, clinical attachment level, and gingival recession. Each defect was surgically exposed and measurements made of the alveolar crest height and base of osseous defect. The test defects were implanted with bioactive glass. The other sites served as unimplanted controls. Flaps were sutured at or close to the presurgical level. Radiographs and soft tissue presurgical measurements were repeated at 6, 9, and 12 months. At 12 months all sites were surgically re‐entered to record osseous measurements. At the 12‐month evaluation, significantly greater mean probing depth reduction was noted in the bioactive glass group compared to the controls (4.26 mm versus 3.44 mm; P = 0.028). Clinical attachment level gain was significantly improved (P = 0.0004) in the bioactive glass sites (2.96 mm) compared to the control sites (1.54 mm). There was significantly less gingival recession in the bioactive glass sites (1.29 mm) compared to the control sites (1.87 mm). Defect fill was significantly greater in the bioactive glass sites (3.28 mm) compared to the control sites (1.45 mm). Defect depth reduction was significantly greater in the bioactive glass sites (4.36 mm) compared to the control sites (3.15 mm). In conclusion, bioactive glass showed significant improvement in clinical parameters compared to open flap debridement. J Periodontol 1998;69:698–709.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Periodontal Regeneration Around Natural TeethAnnals of Periodontology, 1996
- A 4‐year controlled clinical study into the use of a ceramic hydroxylapatite implant material for the treatment of periodontal bone defectsJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 1992
- Comparative Clinical Study of Porous Hydroxyapatite and Decalcified Freeze‐Dried Bone in Human Periodontal DefectsThe Journal of Periodontology, 1990
- Bioactive Glasses, Aluminum Oxide, and Titanium.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1988
- The Use of a Porous Hydroxylapatite Implant in Periodontal DefectsThe Journal of Periodontology, 1988
- The Use of a Porous Hydroxylapatite Implant in Periodontal DefectsThe Journal of Periodontology, 1985
- An Evaluation of Tricalcium Phosphate Implants in Human Periodontal Osseous Defects of Two PatientsThe Journal of Periodontology, 1985
- Periodontal probing: What does it mean?Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 1980
- Histological evaluation of probing depth following periodontal treatmentJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 1980
- Periodontal Disease in Pregnancy II. Correlation Between Oral Hygiene and Periodontal ConditionActa Odontologica Scandinavica, 1964