Comparative Clinical Study of Porous Hydroxyapatite and Decalcified Freeze‐Dried Bone in Human Periodontal Defects
- 1 July 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Periodontology
- Vol. 61 (7) , 399-404
- https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1990.61.7.399
Abstract
INTERPROXIMAL BONY DEFECTS WERE TREATED with either porous hydroxyapatite (PHA) or decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDB) implants at two different clinical centers. Twelve paired defects in 12 patients were treated at each center. Six months post-surgically the defects were measured to assess changes from the presurgical status. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in changes in gingival fluid, bleeding index, plaque index, or tooth mobility. The porous hydroxyapatite implant produced greater reduction in pocket depth (P = 0.03) and more gain in clinical attachment level (P = 0.01) and defect fill (P = 0.001) when compared with DFDB grafted sites. This study indicates that more clinical resolution of interproximal periodontal defects in humans can be obtained with the use of PHA than with the use of DFDB.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparative clinical study of solid and granular porous hydroxylapatite implants in human periodontal osseous defectsJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1988
- The Use of a Porous Hydroxylapatite Implant in Periodontal DefectsThe Journal of Periodontology, 1985
- A Six‐Month Clinical Evaluation of Decalcified Freeze‐Dried Bone Allografts in Periodontal Osseous DefectsThe Journal of Periodontology, 1982
- Preliminary Observations on the Usefulness of a Decalcified, Freeze‐Dried Cancellous Bone Allograft Material in Periodontal SurgeryThe Journal of Periodontology, 1981
- Periodontal Disease in Pregnancy II. Correlation Between Oral Hygiene and Periodontal ConditionActa Odontologica Scandinavica, 1964