Market Maximization of Individual Preferences and Metropolitan Municipal Service Responsibility
- 1 September 1989
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Urban Affairs Quarterly
- Vol. 25 (1) , 86-116
- https://doi.org/10.1177/004208168902500107
Abstract
The assignment of functional responsibility in the American federal system is examined from the perspective of the municipal government. Tiebout's model of market maximization of individual preferences is contrasted with the more recent theories of Buchanan, Peterson, and Miller. The explanation that the historical origins of the city and the permeability of its borders structure the scope and level of its service responsibilities is tested. The findings have significant implications for the mode of municipal service provision and the potential for municipal governments to operate outside of the constraints imposed on them by their position in the American federal system.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Political Economy of Change in Urban Budgetary Politics: A Framework for Analysis and a Case StudyBritish Journal of Political Science, 1983
- The Allocation of Federal Aid Monies: The Synthesis of Demand-Side and Supply-Side ExplanationsAmerican Political Science Review, 1981
- City LimitsPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1981
- Urban Policy: Does Political Structure Matter?American Political Science Review, 1980
- A Unitary Model of Local Taxation and Expenditure Policies in the United StatesBritish Journal of Political Science, 1979
- Structure, Function, and Policy in American CitiesUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1978
- The Responsiveness of Federal and State Governments to Urban ProblemsThe Journal of Politics, 1978
- The Historical Significance of Annexation as a Social ProcessLand Economics, 1973
- Does Local Community Control of Police make a Difference? Some Preliminary FindingsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1973
- Principles of urban fiscal strategyPublic Choice, 1971