Using the coefficient of correlation in method-comparison studies.
- 1 July 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Chemistry
- Vol. 33 (7) , 1170-1176
- https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/33.7.1170
Abstract
The coefficient of correlation (R) is one of the most commonly computed statistics in method-comparison studies. Usually, it is simply quoted without interpretation. In this paper, we show how R may be used to detect interference, nonlinearity, and misuse of the imprecision components. Specifically, one may precisely predict what R should be by considering the imprecisions of the two methods being compared, even before the comparison is performed. When the actual R disagrees with the predicted R, then one of the mentioned effects is present. We also describe a statistical test to detect these effects at the P = 0.05 level, then evaluate this test by using computer simulation and present two examples of its use. We also present the theory underlying the usage of R, including how R is affected by the distribution and range of the data, by the joint imprecisions of the methods being compared, by the sample size, and by the randomness of the specimen-selection process.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Correct and incorrect estimation of within-day and between-day variation.Clinical Chemistry, 1986
- Statistical Analysis of Method Comparison Data: Testing NormalityAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1979
- Incorrect least-squares regression coefficients in method-comparison analysis.Clinical Chemistry, 1979
- Comparison of product moment and rank correlation coefficients in the assessment of laboratory method-comparison data.Clinical Chemistry, 1978
- Application of a method for correcting an observed regression between change and initial value for the bias caused by random errors in the initial value.Clinical Chemistry, 1977
- A Scheme for the Comparison of Quantitative MethodsAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1965