Randomized Trial of a Nonpolymer-Based Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Versus a Polymer-Based Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for the Reduction of Late Lumen Loss
- 17 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 113 (2) , 273-279
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.575977
Abstract
Background— Although drug-eluting stents (DESs) constitute a major achievement in preventing restenosis, concerns remain regarding the increased inflammatory and thrombogenic responses associated with the polymers used. Recently, we showed that a nonpolymer on-site coating with rapamycin not only is feasible and safe but also leads to a dose-dependent reduction in restenosis. Methods and Results— To assess whether polymer-free stents coated on-site with 2% rapamycin solution are inferior to polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents for the prevention of restenosis, we randomly assigned a total of 450 patients with de novo lesions in native coronary vessels, excluding the left main trunk, to either the polymer-free, rapamycin-coated Yukon DES (rapamycin stent) or the polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting Taxus stent (paclitaxel stent). The primary end point was in-stent late lumen loss. Secondary end points were angiographic restenosis and target lesion revascularization. The study was designed to test the noninferiority of the rapamycin stent compared with the paclitaxel stent with respect to late lumen loss according to a noninferiority margin of 0.13 mm. Follow-up angiography was completed in 81% of the patients. The mean difference in in-stent late lumen loss between the rapamycin-stent group and the paclitaxel-stent group was 0.002 mm, and the upper limit of the 1-sided 95% confidence interval was 0.10 mm ( P =0.02 from test for noninferiority). No significant differences were observed regarding angiographic restenosis rates (14.2% with the rapamycin stent and 15.5% with the paclitaxel stent) and target lesion revascularization rates due to restenosis (9.3% in both groups). Conclusions— The polymer-free, rapamycin-coated stent has an antirestenotic effect that is not inferior to that observed with the polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prevention of restenosis by a novel drug-eluting stent system with a dose-adjustable, polymer-free, on-site stent coatingEuropean Heart Journal, 2005
- Incidence, Predictors, and Outcome of Thrombosis After Successful Implantation of Drug-Eluting StentsJAMA, 2005
- Surrogates, substudies, and real clinical end points in trials of drug-eluting stentsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005
- Inhibition of Neointima Formation by a Novel Drug-Eluting Stent System That Allows for Dose-Adjustable, Multiple, and On-Site Stent CoatingArteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 2005
- Late thrombosis in drug-eluting coronary stents after discontinuation of antiplatelet therapyPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Localized Hypersensitivity and Late Coronary Thrombosis Secondary to a Sirolimus-Eluting StentCirculation, 2004
- A Polymer-Based, Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Sirolimus-Eluting Stents versus Standard Stents in Patients with Stenosis in a Native Coronary ArteryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- New Frontiers in CardiologyCirculation, 2003
- Mechanism of Late In-Stent Restenosis After Implantation of a Paclitaxel Derivate–Eluting Polymer Stent System in HumansCirculation, 2002