Comparison of media in the Anaerobe-Tek and Presumpto plate systems and evaluation of the Anaerobe-Tek system for identification of commonly encountered anaerobes
- 1 December 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 16 (6) , 1066-1072
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.16.6.1066-1072.1982
Abstract
Using a variety of sporeforming and nonsporeforming anaerobic bacteria, we compared 10 differential agar media of the Anaerobe-Tek (A/T) system recently marketed by Flow Laboratories, Inc. (McLean, Va.) with 10 comparable media in Presumpto quadrant plates (Presumpto 1, 2, and 3) developed by the Centers for Disease Control Anaerobic Bacteria Branch. The A/T identification system was evaluated by comparing the species identity of anaerobes determined as recommended by the manufacturer's instruction manual with the identity of the strains obtained by the Centers for Disease Control Anaerobe Reference Laboratory by using conventional procedures. We also compared reactions obtained with the Presumpto plates with a chopped meat glucose broth culture as a source of inoculum with those obtained by using a turbid cell suspension from growth on blood agar as inoculum. The agreement of results for the 16 characteristics compared ranged from 92.8 to 100%. Comparison of test results obtained with 10 media in the Presumpto plate and A/T systems from the examination of 223 strains of anaerobes, representing 54 different taxa, showed the following agreement between A/T and CDC systems: catalase production, esculin hydrolysis, glucose fermentation, and lecithinase production (100%); inhibition of growth by bile agar (99.6%); lipase production (99%); DNase (98.7%); fermentation of lactose and mannitol (98.2%); starch hydrolysis (96.9%); gelatin hydrolysis (96.4%); and casein hydrolysis (94.6%). Of the 204 strains of common anaerobes tested with the A/T system, only 70% were correctly identified to the species level. However, several strains could have been identified correctly with the A/T system if data on certain other characteristics had been included in the A/T data base.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Enteric-Tek with API 20E and conventional methods for identification of EnterobacteriaceaeJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1982
- Four methods for identification of gram-negative nonfermenting rods: organisms more commonly encountered in clinical specimensJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1980
- Cultural and physiological characteristics and antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium botulinum isolates from foodborne and infant botulism casesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1980
- Clinical Evaluation of the Uni-Yeast-Tek System for Rapid Presumptive Identification of Medically Important YeastsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1978
- Simple disk technique for detection of nitrate reduction by anaerobic bacteriaJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1977
- Evaluation of commercial systems for the identification of clinical yeast isolatesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1976
- Sodium polyanethol sulfonate sensitivity of anaerobic cocci.1974