Using the medical audit cycle to reduce cesarean section rates
- 31 January 1996
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 174 (1) , 199-205
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70394-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Medical practice guidelines: lessons from the United States.BMJ, 1993
- Clinical Trials and Meta-AnalysisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Effects of feedback of information on clinical practice: a review.BMJ, 1991
- Opinion Leaders vs Audit and Feedback to Implement Practice GuidelinesJAMA, 1991
- The relative risks of caesarean section (intrapartum and elective) and vaginal delivery: a detailed analysis to exclude the effects of medical disorders and other acute pre‐existing physiological disturbancesBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1990
- Medical audit.BMJ, 1990
- The Physician Factor in Cesarean Birth RatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- CAESAREAN SECTION FOR DYSTOCIA: A COMPARISON OF PRACTICES IN TWO COUNTRIESThe Lancet, 1987
- Comparisons of National Cesarean-Section RatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Medical audit cycleMedical Education, 1982