The effect of daily bathing with chlorhexidine on the acquisition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, and healthcare-associated bloodstream infections: Results of a quasi-experimental multicenter trial*
Top Cited Papers
- 1 June 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 37 (6) , 1858-1865
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31819ffe6d
Abstract
Spread of multidrug-resistant organisms within the intensive care unit (ICU) results in substantial morbidity and mortality. Novel strategies are needed to reduce transmission. This study sought to determine if the use of daily chlorhexidine bathing would decrease the incidence of colonization and bloodstream infections (BSI) because of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) among ICU patients. Six ICUs at four academic centers measured the incidence of MRSA and VRE colonization and BSI during a period of bathing with routine soap for 6 months and then compared results with a 6-month period where all admitted patients received daily bathing with a chlorhexidine solution. Changes in incidence were evaluated by Poisson and segmented regression modeling. Daily bathing with a chlorhexidine-containing solution. Acquisition of MRSA decreased 32% (5.04 vs. 3.44 cases/1000 patient days, p = 0.046) and acquisition of VREdecreased 50% (4.35 vs. 2.19 cases/1000 patient days, p = 0.008) following the introduction of daily chlorhexidine bathing. Segmented regression analysis demonstrated significant reductions in VRE bacteremia (p = 0.02) following the introduction of chlorhexidine bathing. VRE-colonized patients bathed with chlorhexidine had a lower risk of developing VRE bacteremia (relative risk 3.35; 95% confidence interval 1.13–9.87; p = 0.035), suggesting that reductions in the level of colonization led to the observed reductions in BSI. We conclude that daily chlorhexidine bathing among ICU patients may reduce the acquisition of MRSA and VRE. The approach is simple to implement and inexpensive and may be an important adjunctive intervention to barrier precautions to reduce acquisition of VRE and MRSA and the subsequent development of healthcare-associated BSI.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus active surveillance program on contact precaution utilization in a surgical intensive care unit*Critical Care Medicine, 2007
- A Clone of Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusamong Professional Football PlayersNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Antimicrobial Resistance Trends and Outbreak Frequency in United States HospitalsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Prevention of Postoperative MediastinitisJournal for Healthcare Quality, 2004
- Vascular Catheter Site Care: The Clinical and Economic Benefits of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Compared with Povidone IodineClinical Infectious Diseases, 2003
- Risk of Methicillin‐ResistantStaphylococcus aureusInfection after Previous Infection or ColonizationClinical Infectious Diseases, 2003
- Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use researchJournal of Clinical Pharmacy & Therapeutics, 2002
- Development of resistance to chlorhexidine diacetate in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the effect of a 'residual' concentrationJournal of Hospital Infection, 2000
- Efficacy evaluaton of a 4% chlorhexidine gluconate as a full-body shower washAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 1993
- Prevention of intraoperative wound contamination with chlorhexidine shower and scrubJournal of Hospital Infection, 1988