The Quantity Flexibility Contract and Supplier-Customer Incentives
- 1 October 1999
- journal article
- Published by Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in Management Science
- Vol. 45 (10) , 1339-1358
- https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.10.1339
Abstract
Consider a supply chain consisting of two independent agents, a supplier (e.g., a manufacturer) and its customer (e.g., a retailer), the latter in turn serving an uncertain market demand. To reconcile manufacturing/procurement time lags with a need for timely response to the market, such supply chains often must commit resources to production quantities based on forecasted rather than realized demand. The customer typically provides a planning forecast of its intended purchase, which does not entail commitment. Benefiting from overproduction while not bearing the immediate costs, the customer has incentive to initially overforecast before eventually purchasing a lesser quantity. The supplier must in turn anticipate such behavior in its production quantity decision. This individually rational behavior results in an inefficient supply chain. This paper models the incentives of the two parties, identifying causes of inefficiency and suggesting remedies. Particular attention is given to the Quantity Flexibility (QF) contract, which couples the customer's commitment to purchase no less than a certain percentage below the forecast with the supplier's guarantee to deliver up to a certain percentage above. Under certain conditions, this method can allocate the costs of market demand uncertainty so as to lead the individually motivated supplier and customer to the systemwide optimal outcome. We characterize the implications of QF contracts for the behavior and performance of both parties, and the supply chain as a whole.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pricing and ordering strategies in manufacturing and distribution alliancesIIE Transactions, 1997
- Analysis of supply contracts with total minimum commitmentIIE Transactions, 1997
- The Right to ReturnThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1996
- Coordination in operations: A taxonomyJournal of Operations Management, 1995
- The principal/agent paradigm: Its relevance to various functional fieldsEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 1993
- Agency Relationships in Marketing: A Review of the Implications and Applications of Agency and Related TheoriesJournal of Marketing, 1992
- Pretia ex Machina? Prices and Process in Long-Term ContractsThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1991
- An Economic Theory of Vertical RestraintsThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1984
- INCENTIVES, UNCERTAINTY, AND RISK IN THE NEWSBOY PROBLEMDecision Sciences, 1979
- Vertical Integration and Antitrust PolicyJournal of Political Economy, 1950