Persuasion by Cheap Talk
Open Access
- 1 December 2010
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 100 (5) , 2361-2382
- https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.5.2361
Abstract
We consider the credibility, persuasiveness, and informativeness of multidimensional cheap talk by an expert to a decision maker. We find that an expert with state-independent preferences can always make credible comparative statements that trade off the expert's incentive to exaggerate on each dimension. Such communication benefits the expert—cheap talk is “persuasive”—if her preferences are quasiconvex. Communication benefits a decision maker by allowing for a more informed decision, but strategic interactions between multiple decision makers can reverse this gain. We apply these results to topics including product recommendations, voting, auction disclosure, and advertising. (JEL D44, D72, D82, D83, M37)Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Information structures in optimal auctionsJournal of Economic Theory, 2007
- Revealing information in auctions: the allocation effectEconomic Theory, 2006
- Best foot forward or best for last in a sequential auction?The RAND Journal of Economics, 2006
- Deliberation, Preference Uncertainty, and Voting RulesAmerican Political Science Review, 2006
- Advertising ContentAmerican Economic Review, 2006
- Long Cheap TalkEconometrica, 2003
- Multiple Referrals and Multidimensional Cheap TalkEconometrica, 2002
- Coordination in Auctions with EntryJournal of Economic Theory, 1998
- Using Privileged Information to Manipulate Markets: Insiders, Gurus, and CredibilityThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1992
- Equivalent Comparisons of ExperimentsThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1953