Biodiversity Offsets and the Challenge of Achieving No Net Loss
Top Cited Papers
- 23 August 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Conservation Biology
- Vol. 27 (6) , 1254-1264
- https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12118
Abstract
Businesses, governments, and financial institutions are increasingly adopting a policy of no net loss of biodiversity for development activities. The goal of no net loss is intended to help relieve tension between conservation and development by enabling economic gains to be achieved without concomitant biodiversity losses. biodiversity offsets represent a necessary component of a much broader mitigation strategy for achieving no net loss following prior application of avoidance, minimization, and remediation measures. However, doubts have been raised about the appropriate use of biodiversity offsets. We examined what no net loss means as a desirable conservation outcome and reviewed the conditions that determine whether, and under what circumstances, biodiversity offsets can help achieve such a goal. We propose a conceptual framework to substitute the often ad hoc approaches evident in many biodiversity offset initiatives. The relevance of biodiversity offsets to no net loss rests on 2 fundamental premises. First, offsets are rarely adequate for achieving no net loss of biodiversity alone. Second, some development effects may be too difficult or risky, or even impossible, to offset. To help to deliver no net loss through biodiversity offsets, biodiversity gains must be comparable to losses, be in addition to conservation gains that may have occurred in absence of the offset, and be lasting and protected from risk of failure. Adherence to these conditions requires consideration of the wider landscape context of development and offset activities, timing of offset delivery, measurement of biodiversity, accounting procedures and rule sets used to calculate biodiversity losses and gains and guide offset design, and approaches to managing risk. Adoption of this framework will strengthen the potential for offsets to provide an ecologically defensible mechanism that can help reconcile conservation and development. Balances de Biodiversidad y el Reto de No Obtener Pérdida Neta.Keywords
Funding Information
- Natural Environmental Research Council (NE/F01614X/1)
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Biodiversity offsets in theory and practiceOryx, 2013
- Where is the avoidance in the implementation of wetland law and policy?Wetlands Ecology and Management, 2011
- The biodiversity bank cannot be a lending bankConservation Letters, 2010
- Synthesis of pattern and process in biodiversity conservation assessment: a flexible whole‐landscape modelling frameworkDiversity and Distributions, 2010
- Simple modelling to assess if offsets schemes can prevent biodiversity loss, using examples from Australian woodlandsBiological Conservation, 2009
- Biodiversity offsets: adding to the conservation estate, or ‘no net loss’?Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 2009
- A dynamic analysis of the wetland mitigation process and its effects on no net loss policyLandscape and Urban Planning, 2009
- A landscape approach for estimating the conservation value of sites and site-based projects, with examples from New ZealandEcological Economics, 2008
- Assessing the biodiversity benefits of plantations: The Plantation Biodiversity Benefits ScoreEcological Management & Restoration, 2008
- Landscape Equivalency Analysis: Methodology for Estimating Spatially Explicit Biodiversity CreditsEnvironmental Management, 2005