Surgery and Marketing: Comparing Different Methods of Radical Prostatectomy
- 31 May 2009
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in European Urology
- Vol. 55 (5) , 1031-1033
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.02.013
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis of Comparative StudiesEuropean Urology, 2009
- Satisfaction and Regret after Open Retropubic or Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical ProstatectomyEuropean Urology, 2008
- Utilization and Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Learning Curve and Preliminary Experience with da Vinci-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical ProstatectomyUrologia Internationalis, 2008
- Predictors of Quality of Life after Radical Treatment for Prostate CancerUrologia Internationalis, 2008
- Comprehensive Prospective Comparative Analysis of Outcomes Between Open and Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Conducted in 2003 to 2005Journal of Urology, 2008
- Oncological and Functional Results of Antegrade Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy for the Treatment of Clinically Localised Prostate CancerEuropean Urology, 2008
- Tension and Energy-Free Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy with Interfascial Dissection of the Neurovascular BundlesEuropean Urology, 2007
- Head‐to‐head comparison of retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic radical prostatectomyInternational Journal of Urology, 2007
- Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparative Study at a Single InstitutionJournal of Urology, 2003