Right ventricular failure in patients with the HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: Incidence, risk factors, and effect on outcomes
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 4 February 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier
- Vol. 139 (5) , 1316-1324
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.11.020
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Changes in Right Ventricular Function During Continuous-low Left Ventricular Assist Device SupportThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2009
- Early planned institution of biventricular mechanical circulatory support results in improved outcomes compared with delayed conversion of a left ventricular assist device to a biventricular assist deviceThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2009
- The Right Ventricular Failure Risk ScoreJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2008
- Use of a Continuous-Flow Device in Patients Awaiting Heart TransplantationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Heart Failure StagesCirculation, 2007
- Is severe right ventricular failure in left ventricular assist device recipients a risk factor for unsuccessful bridging to transplant and post-transplant mortalityThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2004
- The heartmate left ventricular assist system: Worldwide clinical resultsEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1997
- Preoperative and postoperative comparison of patients with univentricular and biventricular support with the thoratec ventricular assist device as a bridge to cardiac transplantationThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1997
- Transplant candidate's clinical status rather than right ventricular function defines need for univentricular versus biventricular supportThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1996
- Use of aprotinin in LVAD recipients reduces blood loss, blood use, and perioperative mortalityThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995