Litigation Risk, Intermediation, and the Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings
- 1 October 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 5 (4) , 709-742
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/5.4.709
Abstract
We formally examine the role of litigation risk in initial public offering (IPO) pricing. The underwriter’s pricing decision trades off current revenue against expected future litigation costs, both of which are increasing in the IPO price. Given a time-consistency constraint and rational expectations on the part of investors, however, the “standard” litigation risk argument does not lead to equilibrium underpricing. We develop a richer model that provides sufficient conditions under which there is equilibrium underpricing. The issuer’s choice of employing an underwriter versus floating the IPO on its own is examined, and various testable implications of the model are developed.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- How investment bankers determine the offer price and allocation of new issuesPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Do the Merits Matter? A Study of Settlements in Securities Class ActionsStanford Law Review, 1991
- Initial Public Offerings and Underwriter ReputationThe Journal of Finance, 1990
- Signalling by underpricing in the IPO marketJournal of Financial Economics, 1989
- The Informational Content of Initial Public OfferingsThe Journal of Finance, 1989
- Signalling and the Pricing of New IssuesThe Journal of Finance, 1989
- Perfect sequential equilibriumJournal of Economic Theory, 1986
- A Model of the Demand for Investment Banking Advising and Distribution Services for New IssuesThe Journal of Finance, 1982
- The Investment Banking Contract for New Issues Under Asymmetric Information: Delegation and the Incentive ProblemThe Journal of Finance, 1980
- The incentive problem and the design of investment banking contractsJournal of Banking & Finance, 1979