Underpowered studies
Open Access
- 1 February 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 89 (2) , 129-131
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.01989.x
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Publication and Related BiasesPublished by SAGE Publications ,2013
- Antiplatelet drugs for prevention of pre-eclampsia and its consequences: systematic reviewBMJ, 2001
- Why “underpowered” trials are not necessarily unethicalThe Lancet, 1997
- Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials:Current Issues and Future DirectionsInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1996
- Clinical trials and rare diseases: a way out of a conundrumBMJ, 1995
- Low dose aspirin in pregnancy and early childhood development: follow up of the collaborative low dose aspirin study in pregnancyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1995
- Empirical Evidence of BiasJAMA, 1995
- A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical ExpertsJAMA, 1992
- Evaluating New Treatments and Diagnostic Technologies in Obstetrics: Practical Problems, Ethics, and SolutionsInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1989
- Statistics and ethics in medical research: III How large a sample?BMJ, 1980