A Guide to Analyzing Message–Response Sequences and Group Interaction Patterns in Computer‐mediated Communication
- 19 January 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Distance Education
- Vol. 26 (3) , 367-383
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500291470
Abstract
This paper proposes a set of methods and a framework for evaluating, modeling, and predicting group interactions in computer‐mediated communication. The method of sequential analysis is described along with specific software tools and techniques to facilitate the analysis of message–response sequences. In addition, the Dialogic Theory and its assumptions are presented to establish a theoretical framework and guide to using sequential analysis in computer‐mediated communication research. Step‐by‐step instructions are presented to illustrate how sequential analysis can be used to measure the way latent variables (e.g., message function, response latency, communication style) and exogenous variables (e.g., gender, discourse rules, context) affect how likely a message is to elicit a response, the types of responses elicited by the message, and whether or not the elicited sequence of responses (e.g., claim → challenge → explain) mirror the processes that support group decision‐making, problem‐solving, and learning.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Computer support for knowledge construction in collaborative learning environmentsComputers in Human Behavior, 2005
- Argument and Decision Making in Computer-Mediated GroupsJournal of Communication, 2004
- The Sequential Analysis of Group Interaction and Critical Thinking in OnlineAmerican Journal of Distance Education, 2003
- The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solvingEducational Technology Research and Development, 2002
- Theoretical Challenges for Distance Education in the 21st Century: A Shift from Structural to Transactional IssuesThe International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2000
- Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1999
- Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer ConferencingJournal of Educational Computing Research, 1997
- Observing InteractionPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1997
- A plea for “more local” theories of cooperative learningLearning and Instruction, 1992
- Alternative designs for evaluating computer-based instructionJournal of Instructional Development, 1984