Genetic Amniocentesis Complications: Is the Incidence Overrated?
- 1 August 2004
- journal article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation
- Vol. 58 (2) , 100-104
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000078793
Abstract
To estimate the complication rate of 2nd-trimester amniocentesis and to determine the associated risk factors. A retrospective chart review of genetic amniocenteses performed at a single tertiary care institution, from 1996 to 1998, was done. The variables studied included gestational age, indication for amniocentesis, number and site of needle punctures, and amniotic fluid color. Complications included fetal loss, rupture of membranes, and bleeding. Out of the 1,347 procedures analyzed, the most common indications were advanced maternal age (72.3%) and abnormal triple screen (20.3%). Transplacental genetic amniocenteses totaled 234 (17.4%). Clear fluid was observed in 98.2% of the patients. Twenty-two complications (1.6%) were observed: fetal loss (0.22%), bleeding (0.59%), and rupture of membranes (0.82%). An abnormal karyotype was detected in 34 (2.5%) fetuses. In separate univariate logistic regression analyses, complications were significantly associated with gestational age [odds ratio OR = 1.19; 95% confidence interval CI = (1.08, 1.32); p = 0.001], number of punctures [OR = 8.2; 95% CI = (1.76, 37.97); p = 0.007], and ultrasound anomalies [OR = 5.82; 95% CI = (1.65, 20.58); p = 0.006]. Gestational age and number of punctures remained significant in multivariate logistic regression analysis. Genetic amniocentesis performed at a tertiary care institution is rather safe, and the fetal loss rate of 0.22% is significantly lower (p < 0.001) than the previously published incidence of 1/200. The risk of complications is significantly and independently associated with advanced gestational age and number of punctures.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk factors predisposing to fetal loss following a second trimester amniocentesisBritish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2001
- Obstetrician-gynecologists performing genetic amniocentesis may be misleading themselves and their patientsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2001
- Fetal loss rate after second trimester amniocentesis at different gestational ageActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1999
- Randomised trial to assess safety and fetal outcome of early and midtrimester amniocentesisThe Lancet, 1998
- Transplacental amniocentesis: Is it really a higher‐risk procedure?Prenatal Diagnosis, 1994
- RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS IN 4606 LOW-RISK WOMENPublished by Elsevier ,1986