Penile Prosthesis Reimplantation
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 137 (1) , 46-47
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)43866-3
Abstract
Occasionally, penile prostheses are removed following erosion, infection or malfunction and they are not replaced immediately. Patients may present later for reimplantation of a penile prosthesis after an interval free of a device. However, no information is available as to the outcome and difficulties of such a procedure. We reviewed the charts of all 305 patients undergoing implantation of a penile prosthesis at our institution and contacted all 8 who had under gone reimplantation. Bilateral prostheses were placed in 4 patients. Unilateral prostheses only could be placed in 2 patients because of extensive fibrosis in the other corporeal body. One of tehse prostheses subsequently was removed because of erosion. In 2 patients the prosthesis could not be implanted in either side because of extensive fibrosis. Of the 8 patients 4 are able to have intercourse (1 with difficulty) and reimplantation of the prosthesis often was difficult or impossible. We conclude that reimplantation of a penile prosthesis is beneficial for some patients but they should be informed of the possibility of unsatisfactory results.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Auto-Injection of the Corpus Cavernosum with a Vasoactive Drug Combination for Vasculogenic ImpotenceJournal of Urology, 1985
- Long-Term Evaluation of the Inflatable Penile ProsthesisJournal of Urology, 1984
- The Jonas Prosthesis—technical Considerations and ResultsJournal of Urology, 1983
- Complications of Penile Prosthesis Surgery for ImpotenceJournal of Urology, 1982
- Inflatable penile prosthesis: Mayo clinic experience with 175 patientsUrology, 1979